"With a focus on compassion, the leader of the Catholic Church has become a new voice of conscience. Managing Editor Nancy Gibbs explains why Francis is TIME's choice for Person of the Year 2013."
Me? I'm in complete agreement on this one. In the days leading up to the announcement, and the release of a short list of candidates for this year's designation, I couldn't help but think that only two of those candidates - Pope Francis and NSA leaker Edward Snowden - came close to meeting the criteria TIME listed.
A lot of coverage and discussion to the announcement, and PLENTY of reaction from pundits and ordinary people ... all of them ranging from the sublime to the ridiculous. There were two that caught my attention today ...
"'Social media pope' wins Person of the Year" was the headline for today's column on Jim Denison's Forum on Truth and Culture.
Denison cites three reasons for TIME's decision ... and suggests they are examples that we might follow.
"First is his commitment to the poor: Francis has been pope only nine months, but he has 'refocused the global conversation on poverty and those in need.' Second is his personal humility: he 'came onto the scene with fanfare and the opposite of fanfare,' serving with genuine sincerity and modesty. Third is his engagement with contemporary media: he is using his office 'in ways that feel almost like a grassroots initiative.'"
Then there's this observation from Jesuit Post, on Twitter with an accompanying Twitter pic, their riff on the TIME cover that sums-up very nicely my own feelings when I consider who MIGHT have been TIME's Person of the Year.
"Speaking of abounding mercy ... "
Amen, brother!
No comments:
Post a Comment